Re: The DiVince Code? Ok, now as a catholic I don't really believe in this, when I read the book and saw the movie and took as nothing but entertainment. In order to believe, I'll need more than just theories but hard facts. People who support this remind me of those who think the moon landing was filmed in a studio, or Roswell Cover up and etc... They have some circumstantial facts and testimonial, but no true hard evidence.
Yet, those who believe in this can really say that this represent that Jesus was man and flesh thus having natural human instincts. I also agree that the book of revelations can be loosely interpreted, as well. Yet, as the cliché saying goes "a picture is worth a thousand words" so can art. The whole deal of Di Vinci putting hidden messages in art is kinda lame and those supports of his theory I believe have a weak augment. It is a cold case to try to know what Di Vinci was actually trying to portray when he painted those picture.
Although, I would highly recommend Dan Brown's "Angels and Demons", actually kicked The Codes ass... It's a good book. |