A World With Out Black People?

[AngelikWispurz]

actually.
there's more
white people
in jail and on welfare
than blacks.
we just get portrayed more.
sociology 101 boo.
take the class.

[Jesus Woks]

Originally Posted by AngelikWispurz

actually.
there's more
white people
in jail and on welfare
than blacks.
we just get portrayed more.
sociology 101 boo.
take the class.

We also outnumber you by a good bit. How about we compare something that's tangible, like percentage of the race's population in jail or on welfare?

If there are five-hundred people in one group and ten of them are criminals, it's hardly as telling about that group as if there were only fifty people with the same amount being criminals.

We need Logic 101 in schools.

[Jay-Rede]

Ahh Black People.. You Gotta Love Em'

[chris]

a world without black people?

umm i'll add a dumb one.... how about females will end up having hard time cumming multiple times?

[Schematic]

^ Cheap shot..

Ok how about fat white girls wouldnt be able to cum mutiple times.

[AngelikWispurz]

Originally Posted by Jesus Woks

We also outnumber you by a good bit. How about we compare something that's tangible, like percentage of the race's population in jail or on welfare?

If there are five-hundred people in one group and ten of them are criminals, it's hardly as telling about that group as if there were only fifty people with the same amount being criminals.

We need Logic 101 in schools.

https://www.msu.edu/user/skourtes/myths.html

like i said.
soc 101.

[FranchisE]

there are already plenty of worlds without black people
they are called suburbs..

[Jesus Woks]

Originally Posted by AngelikWispurz

https://www.msu.edu/user/skourtes/myths.html

like i said.
soc 101.

Read what I said and be less stupid.

[AngelikWispurz]

Originally Posted by Jesus Woks

Read what I said and be less stupid.

but you cant convert
a fraction into a percentage??
and i'm dumb right??
okay. sure.

[impolite]

the fraction doesn't answer his question. it says less than 1/6 of poor households consist of urban black mothers. poor households includes poor households of all races nationwide.
it's not how many blacks are poor versus how many whites are poor. it's how much of the white population is poor versus how much of the black population is poor, and thus the population of each race needs to be taken into account. say there are 14million white people in america, and 5million of them are in poverty.
then there are 7million black people, with 3million in poverty. (just an example, i know those statistics are grossly inaccurate), while less blacks are poor than whites, still a higher percentage of their population is in poverty. i think that was what he was suggesting, hence asking you to consider that there are more whites in america than blacks. and if any of you read james baldwin's memoirs, the places in the world without black people are rather vividly described as neither negative nor positive.

[Jesus Woks]

Originally Posted by impolite

the fraction doesn't answer his question. it says less than 1/6 of poor households consist of urban black mothers. poor households includes poor households of all races nationwide.
it's not how many blacks are poor versus how many whites are poor. it's how much of the white population is poor versus how much of the black population is poor, and thus the population of each race needs to be taken into account. say there are 14million white people in america, and 5million of them are in poverty.
then there are 7million black people, with 3million in poverty. (just an example, i know those statistics are grossly inaccurate), while less blacks are poor than whites, still a higher percentage of their population is in poverty. i think that was what he was suggesting, hence asking you to consider that there are more whites in america than blacks. and if any of you read james baldwin's memoirs, the places in the world without black people are rather vividly described as neither negative nor positive.

Thank you.

Comprehension is a rarity 'round these parts.

[FranchisE]

im half black and half white
and i could honestly say there are most likely a higher PERCENTAGE of black people
on some sort of assistance...but at the same time i kno ALOT of white people
who are in a famlily who could REALLY USE assistance and there parents
are too "proud" to ever apply so they are the ones with the 15 year old couches
and just barely making it...like accepting aid to better there kids lifes has some
sorta stimga about it...where as the black people i kno are more like...whatever it takes
to create the BEST situation possible....im not really saying much
just a personal observation...

[Prospect]

well shit, it would be one thing if they never were in existence in the first place

but if they just 'without'ed right now, id take all their money once they vanished and become the richest white person on the planet

[Blakk Majik]

Originally Posted by Arcanum

Black Invention Myths


no hate... a world without black people would suck.. i agree, just bringing light to some of the myths

That thing is grossly inaccurate. Another racist white man accreditin' all the most significant advances we claim rightfully ours to white inventors. Take note, he consciously selects a peanut as the page's avatar...okay.

Let me count the ways this guy is wrong:

1. The patent number and recognition date is different from the actual development date of the product invented. A traffic light circa 1912 may very well have been set up at the very end of the year. We're speakin' of an era where racism was high, and systems moved slowly. Please explain ta me why it could not have taken an African-American man 2 years ta finally receive a patent for his invention? The first traffic SIGNAL was exactly that, a lamp to see the signs. A traffic light is a completely different item used ta do the same thing, yes...but far more efficiently. If you wanna take it there, they stole those from traffic offers who directed traffic through cross sections...who in turn stole the concept from Egyptians (African people) who developed road and traffic systems in cities even before Greeks did (Pre-Alexander). Movin' on...

2. The Scottish chemist didn't event a gas mask, he invented a bag. The gas MASK separates noxious fumes and gases from air. It catches the toxins. How is that not an original design??? Simply because it's a mask? Get real. I guess the Scottish chemist was also responsible for football helmets.

3. The Aztecs actually created peanut powder, a compound used in make up for war and ritualistic ceremonies. Rather than created, I would say, more or less, stumbled upon. They found the powder would stick to skin and, therefor, used it as such. Peanut butter, however, as a delicacy is made, not only wit' peanut powder, but other edible chemicals to create the paste. The substance afore mentioned in the article is clearly not peanut butter, rather peanut essence. They aren't even the same thing!

4. Charles Drew not discoverin' the advantages of blood plasma usage and storage???!!! Pffffft! He was the FUCKING SUPERVISOR OF THE PROJECT!

I'm done. You figure it out from there. You wanna trust the KKK's obvious attempt at discreditin' African-Americans, you go right ahead.

Originally Posted by Boogiε

Their would be less crime..
Sometime you have to sacrifice something to be crime free...

Right, so I guess the U.S. Government which is the biggest criminal conglomorate of them all and comprised primarily of white people isn't, at least, "partially" responsible for that?

*Walks away chantin'*
World Trade Center...
Price gougin'...
Taxation without representation....
Mass murder....
Conspiracy.....
Espionage.....

Originally Posted by Jesus Woks

We also outnumber you by a good bit. How about we compare something that's tangible, like percentage of the race's population in jail or on welfare?

If there are five-hundred people in one group and ten of them are criminals, it's hardly as telling about that group as if there were only fifty people with the same amount being criminals.

We need Logic 101 in schools.

Uh, let's include world population, homie. Not just American. Not really the majority there, are ya? And you still find more whites imprisoned than blacks...hmmmmmmm.

[AngelikWispurz]

Originally Posted by Blakk Majik

That thing is grossly inaccurate. Another racist white man accreditin' all the most significant advances we claim rightfully ours to white inventors. Take note, he consciously selects a peanut as the page's avatar...okay.

Let me count the ways this guy is wrong:

1. The patent number and recognition date is different from the actual development date of the product invented. A traffic light circa 1912 may very well have been set up at the very end of the year. We're speakin' of an era where racism was high, and systems moved slowly. Please explain ta me why it could not have taken an African-American man 2 years ta finally receive a patent for his invention? The first traffic SIGNAL was exactly that, a lamp to see the signs. A traffic light is a completely different item used ta do the same thing, yes...but far more efficiently. If you wanna take it there, they stole those from traffic offers who directed traffic through cross sections...who in turn stole the concept from Egyptians (African people) who developed road and traffic systems in cities even before Greeks did (Pre-Alexander). Movin' on...

2. The Scottish chemist didn't event a gas mask, he invented a bag. The gas MASK separates noxious fumes and gases from air. It catches the toxins. How is that not an original design??? Simply because it's a mask? Get real. I guess the Scottish chemist was also responsible for football helmets.

3. The Aztecs actually created peanut powder, a compound used in make up for war and ritualistic ceremonies. Rather than created, I would say, more or less, stumbled upon. They found the powder would stick to skin and, therefor, used it as such. Peanut butter, however, as a delicacy is made, not only wit' peanut powder, but other edible chemicals to create the paste. The substance afore mentioned in the article is clearly not peanut butter, rather peanut essence. They aren't even the same thing!

4. Charles Drew not discoverin' the advantages of blood plasma usage and storage???!!! Pffffft! He was the FUCKING SUPERVISOR OF THE PROJECT!

I'm done. You figure it out from there. You wanna trust the KKK's obvious attempt at discreditin' African-Americans, you go right ahead.



Right, so I guess the U.S. Government which is the biggest criminal conglomorate of them all and comprised primarily of white people isn't, at least, "partially" responsible for that?

*Walks away chantin'*
World Trade Center...
Price gougin'...
Taxation without representation....
Mass murder....
Conspiracy.....
Espionage.....



Uh, let's include world population, homie. Not just American. Not really the majority there, are ya? And you still find more whites imprisoned than blacks...hmmmmmmm.

comprehension is
sooo
hard to come by.